Iratta (2023); Malayalam.
This is a BIG spoiler, so if you haven’t watched the film, I will suggest you very strongly to stay away, or else this will ruin your experience of watching this movie and it can only be watched once, for the very reason that it has a major twist at the end, to which this spoiler is directly connected.
Question : When a forensics team collects the murder weapon as to investigate the finger-print(s) on it, they usually go with all the prints (if there are more than one). Even if they don’t have a suspect to match the prints right away, they know the number of prints on the weapon. That’s the basic procedure, I think.
So when they collected the gun from the crime scene, it had the prints of the policeman it belonged to and since Vinod used it, it surely must have his prints on it, too. So why wasn’t it discussed as such? Let’s suppose they thought that someone else made Vinod use it by force, by pulling the trigger when the gun was in Vinod’s hand, even then Vinod’s prints would be there on the gun.
Why didn’t the forensics team mention it? Or did I miss anything crucial?
Submitted December 09, 2025 at 02:07AM by saagarrwaa https://ift.tt/M26OH30
No comments: